#Microservices #SoftwareArchitecture
For a long time, monolithic architectures ruled the roost when it came to application design. However, monolithic architectures can become difficult to manage and scale as applications grow and evolve over time. The idea of microservices emerged as a response to the limitations of traditional monolithic application architecture, which typically involves building an application as a single, large codebase with tightly-coupled components.
By the mid-2000s, digital native companies such as Netflix, Amazon, and Twitter started experimenting with a more lightweight approach to building applications, breaking them down into small, independent services. The idea was to build applications using the Unix philosophy of "Do one thing and do it well."
The term "microservices" was coined in 2011 by James Lewis and Martin Fowler, two software architects who were advocating for this approach. Since then, microservices have become increasingly popular in software development, and many companies have adopted this architecture to build highly scalable, resilient, and flexible applications.
At its core, microservices architecture is a design approach for developing software applications as a collection of small, independent services. Each service is focused on a specific business capability and can be created, deployed, and scaled independently from other services in the application.
Consequently, each service typically has its own database and communicates with other services through lightweight APIs. Developers can build and deploy each service independently, using the programming language and technology stack best suited to its needs.
However, developing, deploying, and managing such a microservices architecture poses its own share of challenges. For instance, managing shared access, ensuring data consistency, maintaining the security of service, facilitating communication between services, and managing dependencies. To address these challenges, microservices design patterns use architectural patterns that provide efficient administration of these services, overcome challenges, and maximize performance. By choosing the right design pattern for your use case, you can increase component reusability and reduce development time and effort. Over time, this can eliminate the need to reinvent the wheel each time you make changes to your application.
While there are several microservices design patterns, we'll discuss some of the most noteworthy and commonly used design patterns here. Find out why they are important and how they are used.
API Gateway: As a microservices-based application grows in complexity, the number of endpoints can become unwieldy, making it difficult to manage and maintain. An API gateway acts as a single entry point to the application, abstracting away the complexity of the underlying microservices. This approach simplifies the communication between the client and the microservices, as clients no longer need to know the specific location or address of each individual microservice. Instead, clients can interact with a single endpoint provided by the API gateway, which then handles the complexity of communicating with the underlying microservices.
API gateways also provide other important functions, such as authentication, rate limiting, request/response transformation, and service discovery. These features can help improve the security, scalability, and reliability of a microservices architecture.
Another benefit of using an API gateway is that it can simplify the management and monitoring of a microservices architecture. By centralizing the routing and communication between services, an API gateway can provide a single point of control for managing traffic and monitoring service performance.
Access tokens: Access tokens are commonly used as a security mechanism in microservice architecture to authorize and authenticate requests between services. Here's how it typically works:
Access tokens are typically generated by an authentication service or identity provider, which is responsible for verifying the identity of users or services and issuing access tokens. The access token usually contains information about the user or service that it represents, as well as a time-to-live (TTL) value that indicates how long the token is valid.
In addition, to the security benefit, access tokens allow for improved scalability and flexibility in a distributed architecture.
Service discovery: Service discovery is the automatic detection of devices and offered services over a network. Discovery, which minimizes configuration efforts for administrators, is commonly found in microservice architectures and containerization platforms.
Service discovery is important because individual services are typically deployed independently in microservices architecture and may run on different servers or containers. Without a service discovery mechanism, each service would need to maintain a manually configured list of other services it needs to communicate with, which would be both tedious and error-prone.
There are different ways to implement service discovery in microservices, but one common approach is to use a service registry. A service registry is a central repository that keeps track of all the services in the system, along with their location and other relevant metadata. When a service needs to communicate with another service, it queries the service registry to find the location of the desired service, and then establishes a connection to it.
Some popular tools for implementing service discovery and service registries in microservices include Consul, etcd, and ZooKeeper. Additionally, some container orchestration platforms, such as Kubernetes, have built-in support for service discovery.
Circuit Breaker pattern: The circuit breaker pattern is a design pattern used in software development to improve the resilience and fault tolerance of a system. It works by detecting failures in a service or component and temporarily halting access to that service or component. This allows the system to handle the failure gracefully and prevent cascading failures that could bring down the entire system. In Microservices, different services communicate with each other over a network, which can introduce a number of potential failures, including network latency, timeouts, and service failures. The circuit breaker pattern is used to improve the reliability and resilience of the system.
Once the service or component has recovered, the circuit breaker can be reset, and requests can resume. This pattern helps prevent overloading a service or component that is already experiencing issues and allows the system to gracefully handle unexpected failures.
By using the circuit breaker pattern, developers can improve the resilience and fault tolerance of the system, reducing the likelihood of downtime or other issues.
Distributed Tracing: Since different services communicate with each other over a network in microservices architecture, a single user request often requires interactions with multiple services.
The distributed tracing pattern is required to instrument the responses and requests between the services, enabling the system to track each interaction as a trace. This trace has all the information about the service involved, including the time taken to process the request and any errors/exceptions that may have occurred.
A distributed tracing system typically consists of three main components: a tracer, a collector, and a visualizer. The tracer is embedded within each microservice and records trace data for each request. The collector aggregates this trace data from different services and sends it to the visualizer, which displays the trace data in a way that is easily understandable by humans.
Distributed tracing helps gain visibility and insight into the flow of requests and responses between different services in a distributed system. This helps developers and operations teams to understand how requests propagate through a complex system and identify performance bottlenecks or errors that may arise as a result.
Distributed tracing also improves observability, and leads to faster root cause analysis and enhanced collaboration.
CQRS and SAGA: CQRS (Command Query Responsibility Segregation) and Saga are two design patterns used in distributed systems and microservices architecture to improve the scalability, performance, and fault tolerance of the system.
CQRS separates the responsibility for handling commands (write operations that change the state of the system) from that of handling queries (read operations that retrieve data from the system). In a CQRS architecture, commands are handled by a separate write model, while queries are handled by a separate read model. This separation can improve the scalability of the system by allowing each model to be optimized for its specific task.
A Saga is a pattern used to manage long-lived transactions that involve multiple services. In a Saga, each service involved in the transaction takes responsibility for its part of the transaction, and a coordinator service manages the overall transaction. The coordinator service communicates with each service to ensure that each step of the transaction is completed successfully. If a step fails, the coordinator service can initiate compensating transactions to undo the steps that have already been completed.
Please read our blog on the importance of CQRS and SAGA in microservices architecture to better understand these microservices design patterns.
Microservices architecture offers a number of benefits for modern application development. However, to leverage its full potential, developers need to identify and deploy relevant design patterns. By using the patterns listed here and others, developers can create microservices-based applications that are easier to develop, maintain, and scale.
Our developers have experience creating microservices architecture for a variety of applications across industries. Please read our case study titled Future-Proofing an Established Marine ERP through Microservice Architecture. We utilize different microservices design patterns to develop highly scalable, flexible, and resilient applications in both Cloud and Non-Cloud (On-premise and Hybrid) environments. Need accelerated development and streamlined maintenance with microservices architecture? Our specialized Product Engineering and Cloud Solutions can help!